Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

trait_duplication_in_bounds checks path segments for trait items #8315

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2022

Conversation

dswij
Copy link
Member

@dswij dswij commented Jan 20, 2022

closes #8306

changelog: [trait_duplication_in_bounds] Fix FP when path segments exists for trait items

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @giraffate

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jan 20, 2022
@giraffate
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

It looks good, thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 24, 2022

📌 Commit 4c1549e has been approved by giraffate

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 24, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 4c1549e with merge 60d3597...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 24, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: giraffate
Pushing 60d3597 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 60d3597 into rust-lang:master Jan 24, 2022
@dswij dswij deleted the 8306 branch January 24, 2022 05:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Misleading error message on traits after #8229
4 participants